Can You Register Pre-ban Weapon With Bullet Button
Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris is joining with land legislators in an effort to criminalize the use of "bullet buttons" in California. (Photo: Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
Calling them "killing machines," legislation introduced with the backing of the state attorney general would crave semi-machine rifles to take their magazines permanently affixed in the country of California.
Two bills debuted past Assembly Democrats with the strong endorsement of Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris would effectively close what the lawmakers term the "bullet button loophole" by banning the devices which crave a tool to remove an otherwise fixed mag from a semi-automatic rifle and require guns already fitted with such buttons since 2001 to register them as "assault weapons" under California law.
The framers of the proposals merits that magazines that are not-detachable forbid the rapid reloading that can increase decease tolls in mass shootings. The AR-xv style rifles used past terrorists in the San Bernardino shooting last Dec had their bullet buttons removed subsequently they were illegally caused through an alleged harbinger purchase.
"Killing machines take no place on our streets and gun violence must not be tolerated," said Assemblymember Marc Levine, D-Marin County, co-author of one of the bills and sponsor of the second, in a statement. "This legislation assures that gun manufacturers cannot work around the intent of California's ban on military-way attack weapons. We raise our children in communities, not state of war zones."
Levine's measure, AB 1664, taken with a companion bill, AB 1663, would classify a semi-automated centerfire burglarize that does non accept a fixed magazine with the capacity to take no more than ten rounds as an assault weapon under state law and define a "detachable mag" to mean an armament feeding device that can be removed from the firearm without disassembly of the action, including ane that can be removed with the use of a tool.
Those with a bullet button would take until 2018 to register their gun and those constitute after that engagement with such a device installed on an unregistered rifle would be liable to a felony charge and upwards to a year in prison.
"Detachable magazines toll lives, and it is more of import to save lives during future mass shootings than to exist able to reload set on weapons in the glimmer of an eye," said Assemblymember David Chiu, D-San Francisco, sponsor of AB 1663.
Equally an aide to U.S. Sen. Paul Simon, D-Illinois in the 1990s, Chiu worked on gun legislation to include the federal assault weapon ban, before moving into San Francisco city politics with the support of Kamala Harris and Leland Yee. He at present holds the third highest-ranking position in the country associates though simply a freshman assemblymember.
Yee, who plead guilty on federal corruption charges terminal year, backed a similar bullet push button ban in 2012 which tanked, while Gov. Jerry Dark-brown vetoed a 2013 bill to exercise the same thing that made it to his desk.
Now, Harris is supporting Chiu once again in backing the bullet button legislation.
"The devastation wrought by gun violence on innocent victims, children and families in this land is an international embarrassment," said Harris, who is currently seeking a U.South. Senate seat, in a statement issued past her role. "This is a common sense solution that closes a unsafe loophole in California's assault weapons ban."
Gun rights advocates in the state are mobilizing to help cease the latest incremental regulation on firearms in the Golden State and point to Bay area politics every bit a driving bespeak behind the motion.
"Assembly Bill 1663 is all the same some other misguided set on on the civil rights of law-abiding Californians," Brandon Combs, president of Firearms Policy Coalition, told Guns.com. "In the wake of a deadly terrorist attack on our soil, fringe San Francisco elitists similar Assemblyman Chiu and Attorney General Harris would rather put innocent people in jail than confront to their ain failed policies."
The FPC is actively opposing the measure out and is circulating a petition to abet with lawmakers confronting the ban.
Gun control groups to include the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Campaign are supporting the bullet button ban, arguing the devices, only used in California, were a way for gun makers to circumvent state law.
"Since California'due south first assault weapons law was passed in 1989 in the wake of the tragic Stockton schoolyard shooting, we take struggled to make it real in the face of the gun industry's determination to find new means to evade the police force's intent," said Amanda Wilcox with the Brady Campaign. "Curbing the power to quickly reload will decrease the lethality in future mass shootings and save lives."
Can You Register Pre-ban Weapon With Bullet Button,
Source: https://www.guns.com/news/2016/01/15/california-moves-to-ban-bullet-buttons-on-semi-auto-rifles
Posted by: hallconsicur1998.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Can You Register Pre-ban Weapon With Bullet Button"
Post a Comment